Comments on: Visionaries Shall Inherit the Future http://www.visionforce.com/blog/?p=137 The official blog for the revolutionary VisionForce human technology begun by Michael Ivan Skye Thu, 12 May 2011 21:52:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Trine http://www.visionforce.com/blog/?p=137#comment-4719 Trine Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:40:29 +0000 http://www.visionforce.com/blog/?p=137#comment-4719 RE nameless force... Firstly to me theres an eeenormous difference between Force and POWers,we force someone to,wer power someone up.they are not interchnageable( well they are,but thats another story) So Nameless Powers,worth stopping there to think about that,as an expression,put THe Nameless,then \THe Nameless powers,takes on a whole new meaning.And the Nameless does! So now to matters of universes.He/she,lives in a different univrse one of those phrases which says UH,what does that mean? especially asa physically were al,on the same PLanet,though from the way we Behave??? anyone could be forgiven for thinking,but then thought ain't so bright.As Bush And Blair and others have graphically shown with the disasterous alliance,which is going nowhere; which should be no surprise,it was totally prediictable..THe Lack.and it is,distinct lack in domestic and forgeignb policy,but more than that,cluttered ideologies,and confusional rhetorics. Which lead to,as the unnamed forseillustrates,surmountable.Of course war is preventable. Thats something our species knew centuaries ago,yet herer we go .at a loss,yet again RE nameless force…
Firstly to me theres an eeenormous difference between Force and POWers,we force someone to,wer power someone up.they are not interchnageable( well they are,but thats another story)

So Nameless Powers,worth stopping there to think about that,as an expression,put THe Nameless,then \THe Nameless powers,takes on a whole new meaning.And the Nameless does!

So now to matters of universes.He/she,lives in a different univrse one of those phrases which says UH,what does that mean? especially asa physically were al,on the same PLanet,though from the way we Behave??? anyone could be forgiven for thinking,but then thought ain’t so bright.As Bush And Blair and others have graphically shown with the disasterous alliance,which is going nowhere; which should be no surprise,it was totally prediictable..THe Lack.and it is,distinct lack in domestic and forgeignb policy,but more than that,cluttered ideologies,and confusional rhetorics.

Which lead to,as the unnamed forseillustrates,surmountable.Of course war is preventable.
Thats something our species knew centuaries ago,yet herer we go .at a loss,yet again

]]> By: MythMan http://www.visionforce.com/blog/?p=137#comment-4515 MythMan Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:09:10 +0000 http://www.visionforce.com/blog/?p=137#comment-4515 NOT EXACTLY. Saying "the visionaries shall inherit the future" (implying that the blind-followers won't be there) is like saying 'only RETARDED only-children of wealthy business-people will inherit massive-fortunes.' You see, "inherit" means 'to receive by merit of existance.' It DOESN'T mean 'to take something'; and visionaries must "take" the future for it to be theirs. I would rather that you said, "The Visionaries Shall Inherit the BUILDING-RIGHTS ON THE Future." Because ALL PEOPLE inherit the future (since they're there when it happens), but only the powerful can CONTROL the future! NOT EXACTLY. Saying “the visionaries shall inherit the future” (implying that the blind-followers won’t be there) is like saying ‘only RETARDED only-children of wealthy business-people will inherit massive-fortunes.’

You see, “inherit” means ‘to receive by merit of existance.’ It DOESN’T mean ‘to take something’; and visionaries must “take” the future for it to be theirs.

I would rather that you said, “The Visionaries Shall Inherit the BUILDING-RIGHTS ON THE Future.” Because ALL PEOPLE inherit the future (since they’re there when it happens), but only the powerful can CONTROL the future!

]]>